Demonstration of cases | True and false "Sofia" trademarks settled in the hammer: 8.3 million yuan!

"Sophia" is a familiar household brand with stores all over the country. The growth of enterprises is followed by not only the rise in performance, but also the headache of brand rights protection.

Brief of the case

Sophia Home Co., LTD. (referred to as Sophia Company) was established in 2003, the main products are cabinet customized home. Since 2016, the company has found that three companies in Hunan have used "Sophia", "Sophia Wooden door" and "Sophia wooden door" on the same or similar product doors/wooden doors as Sophia without authorization. Sesame Blossom "trademark and product promotion and sales, website construction, investment, etc., resulting in consumer confusion and misidentification. Sophia then filed trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuits against the three companies.

2.jpeg

Examination of trial

01 Malicious registration

The trademark "Sophia" is widely known and was confirmed as a well-known trademark by the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board in 2015. As a manufacturer in the home furnishing industry, the defendant three companies, knowing that the "Sofia" brand has existed for many years, still maliciously registered a series of the same or similar trademarks, and continued to use and carry out the production, sales and investment promotion of infringing products after the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board made an invalid ruling on the trademarks involved, which has constituted unfair competition acts that have attached the reputation of the plaintiff. The nature of infringement is serious and the malicious intent of infringement is obvious.
02 Proof of obstruction
Janus Company, one of the defendants, refused to provide the company's financial books and materials to the court without justifiable reasons, resulting in the infringement of profits can not be ascertained, thus it is concluded that Janus company should bear the burden of obstruction of proof.
03 Amount of compensation
The available evidence is sufficient to prove that the defendant's profit from trademark infringement exceeds 3 million yuan, and the court decides that the amount of compensation for economic losses in this case is 8 million yuan based on the evidence of the whole case and the amount of compensation for unfair competition.

3.jpeg

The picture shows the infringing trademark involved

 

 

result of judgment

The court ordered the defendant to stop the infringement, make a public apology and pay the amount of compensation of 8 million yuan and the reasonable cost of rights protection of 363,229 yuan.

 

The court of second instance upheld the original decision.4.pngAfter the decision took effect, the defendant published an apology in China Intellectual Property News.

 

 

Law link

Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 57 Any of the following acts shall constitute an infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark:
(1) using a trademark identical to its registered trademark on the same kind of goods without the permission of the trademark registrant;
(2) Without the permission of the trademark registrant, using a trademark similar to its registered trademark in respect of the same kind of goods, or using a trademark identical with or similar to its registered trademark in respect of similar goods, which is likely to cause confusion;
(3) selling goods that infringe upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark;
(4) forging or manufacturing without authorization the marks of a registered trademark of another person or selling the marks of a registered trademark forged or manufactured without authorization;
(5) replacing its registered trademark without the consent of the trademark registrant and placing the goods with the replaced trademark back on the market;
(6) Intentionally providing convenient conditions for the infringement of another person's exclusive right to use a trademark, helping another person to carry out the infringement of the exclusive right to use a trademark;
(7) causing other damage to another person's exclusive right to use a registered trademark.
Anti-unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China
Article 6 A business operator shall not engage in any of the following acts of confusion to cause people to be mistaken for another person's commodities or to have a specific connection with another person:
(1) Unauthorized use of the name of a commodity, packaging, decoration, etc., which is the same or similar to others;
(2) Unauthorized use of enterprise names (including abbreviations, shop names, etc.), social organization names (including abbreviations, etc.), names (including pen names, stage names, translated names, etc.) that have certain influence on others;
(3) Unauthorized use of the main part of the domain name, the name of the website, the webpage, etc., which has certain influence on others;
(4) other acts of confusion that are sufficient to cause people to be mistaken for the goods of others or have specific connections with others.
 

Judge's statement

Trademark right is not only an important intangible asset, but also the core competitiveness of an enterprise. In recent years, enterprises have encountered trademark infringement and unfair competition from time to time, and insist on fighting against various malicious infringements to the end, not only to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of their own brands, but also to protect the rights and interests of consumers, so that consumers can easily buy high-quality and reliable products, and promote a healthier and more orderly market development. On the contrary, the purpose of carrying the big brand express to achieve the fast consumption of products and services seems to be to make quick money, but it will eventually escape the bitter fruit of infringement compensation.

 

Source: Guangzhou Haizhu Court

More intellectual property information and services

Pay attention to [Shenkexin Intellectual Property] Official subscription number

8abdc3c5-7621-47a0-90cf-ed6a9f51a48d.jpg

More deeply credible dynamic news, important data/report/case, etc.

Pay attention to the [Shenkexin Intellectual Property Service Platform] official service number

image-20220829111309-2.jpeg

Related Cases

Demonstration of case | Dedication involved, the application for the "Qixia Apple Bailan Di" trademark application was rejected

In THE process of applying for the registration of the trademark "THE QIXIA APPLE BRANDY", the State Intellectual Property Office of the defendant held that the trademark violated the provisions of Article 10, paragraph 1 (7) of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Trademark Law) and was deceptive, which could easily cause the public to misidentify the quality and other characteristics of the commodity or the origin of the product. Therefore, the trademark application is rejected. The plaintiff argued that its trademark was not deceptive and filed a lawsuit to vacate the decision against it, requiring the defendant to make a new decision.

2022-07-19

Detail

Ordinary bag take off the rivets second brand-name bag, court: constitutes a trademark infringement judgment of 80,000 yuan!

Move the hand, the letter "E" changes the letter "L", the ordinary bag becomes a brand-name bag, what design is so "clever"? Was it deliberate or just a coincidence? Recently, Guangzhou Huadu Court announced the trademark infringement dispute.

2022-07-16

Detail

Over $100 million in damages! Minhua furniture infringes Raffel's patent and appearance rights in the United States

In November 2018, Raffel sued Minhua Holdings in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleging infringement of seven patents,

2022-06-21

Detail

$3.1 million judgment! Midea dishwashers firmly defend their rights, and Huadi was convicted of infringement and added a new case (fourth case)

It is understood that the Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Province (hereinafter referred to as "Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court") has made a new first-instance judgment on the patent infringement case of Foshan Shunde District Midea Washing Appliance Manufacturing Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Midea") v. Huadi Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Huadi") dishwasher (2021) Zhejiang 01 Zhminchu No. 544,

2022-06-16

Detail

Case of copyright infringement and unfair competition between Shenzhen Chuangmeng World Technology Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Hifan Technology Co., LTD., Hangzhou Youbige Technology Co., LTD

Appellant Pinchuang Company and appellant Yuan Desheng Company and other utility model patent infringement disputes Yuan Desheng Plastic Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Yuan Desheng Company) is the patentee of patent No. ZL201420522729.0, the name of "an integrated selfie device" utility model patent. Zhongshan Pinchuang Plastic Products Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Pinchuang Company), mainly accept foreign processing orders, production of related products. On May 9, 2017, in the (2016) Yue 73 Minchu No. 2351 case, Yuan Desheng Company reached a settlement agreement with Pinchuang Company and Zhongshan Rigao Precision Industry Co., LTD., agreeing that Pinchuang Company stopped producing, selling and promising to sell the accused infringing products, and compensated Yuan Desheng Company 35,000 yuan.

2022-06-07

Detail
5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Head Office13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

Head Office

13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Subsidiary Company2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

Subsidiary Company

2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

图片名称

Service Number

订阅号.jpg

Subscription Number


Copyright ©2016 Shenzhen Shenkexin patent Agency Co., LTD All rights reserved | 粤ICP备2021174526号

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有 | 粤ICP备2021174526号 SEO标签

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有

粤ICP备2021174526号