vivo suffered trademark infringement some Tong some Di company production and sales of vivi brand mobile phone sales

Weiwo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen YouPintong Electronic Technology Co., LTD., Shenzhen Huatang Disun Technology Co., Ltd. infringement of trademark disputes

Brief

The plaintiff Weiwei Company vs. the defendant Youpintong Company, etc. used "vivi" as the trademark and "vivi" as the product name of the mobile phone products produced by it, registered the website with the domain name "vivi-china.com" and promoted the mobile phone products using "vivi" as the trademark and product name. At the same time, it carried out large-scale publicity and sales through dozens of stores on Taobao.com; The defendant Huatang Disun Company registered a shop named "Huatang Disun Technology" on Taobao.com, through which it sold a number of mobile phone products produced by the defendant YouPintong Company using "vivi" as a trademark and product name, and the sales amount was huge.

During the trial of the case, Weiwo Company applied to the court for act preservation, and the Futian District People's Court of Shenzhen ruled that: Respondent Shenzhen YouPintong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. shall immediately cease the production and sale of mobile phone products with the "vivi" logo, and immediately cease the publicity of mobile phone products with the "vivi" logo on the website www.vivi-china.com; Shenzhen Huatang Disun Technology Co., Ltd. immediately stopped selling mobile phone products with the "vivi" logo. After the ruling was made, the Futian Court immediately served a notice of assistance in enforcement to Zhejiang Taobao Network Co., Ltd. and the defendant Youpin Tong Company. Subsequently, the Taobao store operated by the defendant Huatang Disun Company removed the accused infringing products, and the website "www.vivi-china.com" operated by the defendant YouPintong company could not be opened.

Youpintong company refused to accept the above ruling and filed an application for reconsideration. The People's Court of Futian District of Shenzhen made a civil ruling on reconsideration: Rejecting the reconsideration request of the applicant, Shenzhen YouPintong Electronic Technology Co., LTD.

Case revelation

In summary, before the cottage behavior of others, vivo official just did not pay attention to, the result has led to the cottage brand "vivi" more and more rampant, at ultra-low prices began to divide the market, cottage mobile phone greatly discounted functional configuration, but also seriously affected the reputation and reputation of the vivo brand in the market. The case of vivo's public fight against fake vivi, I believe it can also play a warning role for other cottage businesses. In the market competition, if there is no hard strength of real materials, just blindly wrapped in other people's brand packaging, relying on other people's brand heat to obtain money, after all, good times are not long, but also to pay for their own "clever" double the price.

Since the implementation of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues relating to the Application of Law to Intellectual Property Dispute Act Preservation Cases, this case has made the first decision on act preservation in intellectual property litigation in the city, and has ruled on the reconsideration of the respondent to clarify in detail the reasons why the reconsideration is not established.

Source: China (Shenzhen) Intellectual Property Protection Center Case database project team,

Supreme People's Court Intellectual Property Tribunal,

Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court Intellectual Property Division,

Beijing/Shanghai/Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court,

"Lexmachina", "Westlaw" and other legal analysis platforms

Please indicate the above information

Related Cases

Real zongzi in a fake box? The distributor infringes the trademark of Wufangzhai, a "time-honored Chinese brand"

Recently, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court (hereinafter referred to as the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court) rejected the appeal on the trademark infringement dispute between the appellant Zhejiang Wufangzhai Industrial Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Wufangzhai Company) and the appellant Shanghai Su Xianguge Industrial Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Su Xianguge Company) and Shanghai Yingli Industrial Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Yingli Company). The final judgment upheld.

2022-06-05

Detail

Taizhou Tianfu Rice Industry Co., Ltd. and Wuchang Rice Association trademark infringement dispute cases

In October 2019, the plaintiff Wuchang Rice Association found that "Wuchang" was used as the search keyword for a number of products in the "Chongming Island Food Flagship Store" operated by Tianfu Rice Industry Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Tianfu Rice Industry Co., LTD.) on the e-commerce platform of "Jingdong Mall". For example, enter "Wuchang" in the website "www.jd.com". Tianfu Rice Industry Co., LTD. 's "Chongming Island" rice products can be seen in the search results. Click on the product named "2018 new rice [daily order 2 hours freshly ground straight] Chongming Island Rice 500g postal fragrant rice rice Rice Rice Farm rice", you can enter the product details page, the page shows the store name as "Chongming Island Food Flagship Store". Wuchang Rice Association that Jingdong company, Tianfu rice industry company violated its trademark rights and unfair competition, then the two defendants to the court.

2022-06-05

Detail

Li Liuwei illegal manufacturing of registered trademark logo crime: the "DW" logo printed on the box of its production and sold

The defendant Li Liwei and his wife Lai Moumou have been printed "DW" logos on the box and sold it and sell them without obtaining the permission of the registered trademark ownership. On December 29, 2017, the defendant Li Liwei and his wife Lai Moumou were sentenced to punishment for illegal manufacturing registered trademark marks. During the testing period of the previous sin, Li Liwei also implemented the behavior of selling the boxes printed with the "DW" logo to others. According to the report, the public security organs arrested the defendant Li Liuwei in a house in Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen.

2022-05-31

Detail

Appellant Ma XX and appellant Shenzhen Chow Tai Fook Online Media Co., LTD. (referred to as Chow Tai Fook Company), the first instance defendant Jingdong company infringement of trademark rights dispute

The Beijing Intellectual Property Court concluded the trademark infringement dispute between the appellant Ma Mou and the appellee Shenzhen Chow Tai Fook Online Media Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Chow Tai Fook Company) and the first instance defendant Beijing Jingdong Sanbai Lu Shidu E-commerce Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Jingdong Company). It was found that the appellant Ma XX filed an infringement lawsuit against Chow Tai Fook Company for fair use of the trademark rights acquired in bad faith, which constituted an abuse of rights, so the appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld.

2022-05-30

Detail

The second instance adjudicated compensation of 750,000 yuan in the dispute over unfair competition of trademark |

In recent years, there have been a number of "Tiger Square Bridge Jing Tian red fried cake" stores on the market, who is the legitimate right subject of "Jing Tian Red" brand? The Beijing Intellectual Property Court recently concluded a dispute over unfair competition involving the brand rights of "Beijing Tianhong".

2022-05-16

Detail

Red Bull trademark case new judgment: Reignwood three defendants were awarded more than 200 million yuan in the first instance

There have been new developments in the dispute between Red Bull Thailand and Reignwood Red Bull. Recently, the Tianhe District People's Court of Guangzhou...

2022-05-14

Detail

China Resources (Group) Co., LTD., China Resources Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. and other trademark infringement disputes civil retrial judgment

Retrial of the applicant China Resources (Group) Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as China Resources Group) and China Resources Intellectual Property Management Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as China Resources Intellectual Property Company) for trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes with the respondent China Resources Lighting Store (hereinafter referred to as China Resources Store) in Jinniu District, Chengdu, If you are not satisfied with the civil judgment No. 174 of Sichuan Higher People's Court (2020), apply to the court for a retrial.

2022-04-21

Detail
5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Head Office13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

Head Office

13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Subsidiary Company2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

Subsidiary Company

2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

图片名称

Service Number

订阅号.jpg

Subscription Number


Copyright ©2016 Shenzhen Shenkexin patent Agency Co., LTD All rights reserved | 粤ICP备2021174526号

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有 | 粤ICP备2021174526号 SEO标签

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有

粤ICP备2021174526号