The top 10 cases of patent reexamination invalidity in 2022 were released

On April 25, the top ten cases of invalidation of patent reexamination in 2022 were officially released at the Open Day of the State Intellectual Property Office.

 s_2304252230281584289.jpg

  Top 10 cases of patent reexamination invalidation in 2022It includes 8 invention patent invalidation cases, 1 utility model patent invalidation case and 1 design patent invalidation case.The case involvesArtificial intelligence, standard essential patents, genetic engineering drugs, traditional Chinese medicine compound preparations, new energy and other patented technologies,Some typical or frontier legal issues such as the evaluation criteria of creativity in new fields and new forms of business, the application of the "confidential review" clause, the judgment of the conflict between design and trademark rights, and the recognition of priority are explained in depth.👉The relevant decisions can be found here👈

Since 2010, the State Intellectual Property Office has selected and published the top ten annual cases from the reviewed and invalid cases for many years in a row, which has attracted wide attention from the industry and the public. The selection and publication of the top 10 annual cases have played a positive role in explaining patent examination standards, strengthening the legal protection and protection of intellectual property rights, and stimulating innovation.

More intellectual property information and services

 

The official subscription number of "Deep Trusted Intellectual Property Rights" on the code

官方订阅号.jpg

More in-depth and credible dynamic news, important data/reports of the intellectual property industry, etc

 

Code on the concern [deep trusted intellectual property service platform] official service number

官方服务号.jpeg

Related Cases

Ten typical cases of the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court in 2022 to serve and safeguard scientific and technological innovation

1, satellite navigation chip invention patent infringement case 2, "artificial bone" technology investment patent rights case 3, gene fingerprint detection of new varieties of plants 4, "tower granulation production particle compound fertilizer" invention patent infringement case 5, divided case application patent temporary protection fee case 6, involving criminal and civil cross technical secrets infringement case 7, Innovation "double cycle, multiple rounds" identification computer software infringement case 8, "You Manager" wechat marketing software unfair competition case 9, "Takeup switching device" service invention patent application right case 10, German enterprise "modified polyisocyanate" invention patent infringement case

2023-03-01

Detail

Is online shopping infringing when the goods are not even shipped?

The plaintiff a glass products company is the patentee of a wine bottle design patent, and the plaintiff believes that the defendant a winery company manufactured and sold a "lightning wine" (referred to as the accused infringing product), the accused infringing product completely falls within the scope of the plaintiff's patent protection, constituting a violation of the plaintiff's patent right.

2023-02-24

Detail

For patent cases | where there is no substantial difference in the overall visual effect through overall observation and comprehensive judgment, the two forms an approximation and fall into the scope of patent protection involved

Galima Company claims that the product accused of infringement adopts the design of the appearance patent No. ZL202030343224.9, and its behavior does not constitute infringement. In this regard, the Court of second instance held that Article 23 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Disputes (II) provides that: "Where the alleged infringing technical scheme or design falls within the scope of protection of the prior patent right involved, and the accused infringer argues that his technical scheme or design has been granted a patent right to not infringe the patent right involved, the people's court shall not support it."

2022-12-11

Detail

Typical case of national court | Invention patent infringement dispute case of "manufacturing method of vanadium nitride"

"A hemostatic clamp" invention patent infringement dispute Case No. 1: (2020) Zhejiang 02 Zhminchu 261 ★ Case Introduction ★ Plaintiff: Nanwei Medical Technology Co., LTD. (Nanwei Company for short) Defendant: Zhuji Pengtian Medical Equipment Co., LTD. (referred to as Pengtian Company) Nanwei Company is the patent holder of the invention of "a hemostatic clamp" with patent number ZL201410222753.7. Nanwei Company referred to as Pengtian company manufacturing and sales of "disposable hemostatic clamp" product suspected of infringement of its invention patent, to the court to request rights protection.

2022-11-22

Detail

The establishment elements of the legal source defense are discussed in the "Intelligent Story Machine" case by the interpretation of the case |

The defendant Qianghua Products Store believes that the accused infringing products sold by it have legal sources and should not be liable for compensation. The Beijing Intellectual Property Court held that the Qianghua product store submitted the order page screenshot of the 1688 e-commerce platform, the enterprise information of Yamei Electronic factory and the "Letter of Authorization" and other evidence, the recipient of the order Li Yongqiang and Qianghua product store operator Zhong Rihua husband and wife relationship, The delivery address and the business premises of Qianghua product store are all in the Hakka New World, Meixian District, Meizhou City

2022-10-31

Detail

How does patent contribution Rate affect damages in infringement cases? Court ruling: Cooling the air conditioning patent dispute

Recently, the Supreme People's Court made a final judgment on an invention patent infringement dispute involving air conditioning, rejecting the appeals of both appellants, and upholding the Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court's decision that the accused infringing party Guangdong Meibo Refrigeration Equipment Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Guangdong Meibo Company) immediately stop the infringement. And compensate the patentee TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as TCL Company) economic losses, a total of 1.68 million yuan of the first instance judgment.

2022-09-02

Detail

Claim 10 million yuan! The case of the whole way company against the Fuaisi company for infringement of invention patent is successful

The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court has ruled that the plaintiff, Shenzhen Quanwei Intellectual Property Operation Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Quanwei Company), and the defendant, Guangdong Fuaisi Ecological Technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Fuaisi Company), be allowed to withdraw the lawsuit. In this case, Quanwei Company appealed to the court to order Fuaisi Company to stop infringing the invention patent, dismantle the tower granulation equipment, and compensate for economic losses of 10 million yuan.

2022-09-02

Detail

Brilliance Auto is suing Dongfeng and Honda in the US over sensor-related patents

(August 31), Auto Brilliance LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Brilliance Automobile") filed a lawsuit in the United States Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Japanese automakers Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Nissan") and Honda Motor Co. (hereinafter referred to as "Honda"). The complaint alleges that Nissan and Honda infringed patents related to sensor calibration and adjustment claimed by Brilliance.

2022-09-02

Detail

Case review | The identification of the act of manufacturing patented products was jointly implemented in the commissioned processing

Appellant Boffite Co., Ltd. filed an appeal to the Court of second instance against the civil judgment of Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Province (2019) No. 2239 of Zhejiang 01 Minchu due to the dispute over design patent infringement with appellee Jingcheng Sanhe Co., LTD., Taobao Co., LTD. After accepting the case on May 13, 2020, the court of second instance formed a collegial panel to hear the case in accordance with the law. The case is now closed.

2022-08-26

Detail

Claim $130 million! Ningde Times again sued China New Air patent infringement and unfair competition dispute

One wave after another, the patent attack and defense war between Ningde Era and Zhongchuang New Aviation is still continuing to see, reflecting the intensifying competition of industry technology and talent. Ningde Times received a $5 million settlement from Hive Energy.

2022-08-02

Detail
5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Head Office13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

Head Office

13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Subsidiary Company2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

Subsidiary Company

2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

图片名称

Service Number

订阅号.jpg

Subscription Number


Copyright ©2016 Shenzhen Shenkexin patent Agency Co., LTD All rights reserved | 粤ICP备2021174526号

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有 | 粤ICP备2021174526号 SEO标签

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有

粤ICP备2021174526号