Does using another person's trademark as a search keyword constitute trademark infringement?

Enter the trademark name of your own brand in the search engine, click the search out of the page but there are competitors to join the advertisement, does it constitute trademark infringement?

Recently, Yueqing Court in Zhejiang Province heard a trademark infringement dispute, the defendant of an Anhui Internet information company's infringement made a first-instance judgment.

 

Review of the case

The plaintiff Yueqing City, A catering company for A fried chicken series trademark owner, opened a number of stores across the country.

In July 2021, the plaintiff discovered that the defendant in a search engine, will A trademark name owned by the plaintiff placed as a commercial promotion in the search page keywordAnd in the search link title and promotional content under the titleThe name "A fried chicken" is used, but the content displayed after clicking on the website is an advertisement for B fried chicken that compets with the plaintiff in the same industry. After inquiry, the main body of the record of the website involved is the defendant An Hui network information company.

The plaintiff believes that the defendant set "A fried chicken" as the link title keyword to mislead the public and infringe its trademark exclusive right. On October 22, 2021, the plaintiff appealed to Yueqing Court, asking the defendant to compensate for economic losses Sixty thousand yuan.

 

The first instance judgement

Yueqing court after hearing that the "A fried chicken" registered trademark is legal and valid, should be protected by law, the defendant's behavior infringed the plaintiff's trademark right, because the plaintiff failed to provide evidence to prove the loss suffered by the defendant's infringement, so the defendant compensation to the plaintiff 15,000 yuan,And published a statement in the Rule of Law Daily within a month to eliminate the impact.

Mediation of second instance

The defendant refused to accept the judgment, and appealed on April 20, 2022, claiming that the amount of infringement determined by the original trial court was too high, that the plaintiff company had no evidence to prove that its business reputation had been affected, and that the elimination of the impact was inconsistent with the facts. After the case was mediated by the Wenzhou Intermediate People's Court, the two sides reached a mediation agreement, and the defendant paid the agreed amount.

 

Judge's message

When Internet users enter keywords into search engines, the purpose is to find information related to the keywords, and trademark keywords appear on the search results page, which can play a role in identifying the source of services for the relevant public. Such use behavior with the nature of trademarks should be punished Trademark Act

Operators in market competition should abide by the principle of good faith and abide by the recognized business ethics, and have to make proper use of others' business achievements to seek market trading opportunities. In addition, Internet users pay attention to be more discerning when browsing to avoid being cheated.

 

 

1.png

 

Source: Yueqing Court

Editor: Wang Wei Editor: Yang Dongbin

Source of material: three court of the people

More intellectual property information and services

Pay attention to [Shenkexin Intellectual Property] Official subscription number

8abdc3c5-7621-47a0-90cf-ed6a9f51a48d.jpg

More deeply credible dynamic news, important data/report/case, etc.

Pay attention to the [Shenkexin Intellectual Property Service Platform] official service number

image-20220829111309-2.jpeg

Related Cases

Ordinary bag take off the rivets second brand-name bag, court: constitutes a trademark infringement judgment of 80,000 yuan!

Move the hand, the letter "E" changes the letter "L", the ordinary bag becomes a brand-name bag, what design is so "clever"? Was it deliberate or just a coincidence? Recently, Guangzhou Huadu Court announced the trademark infringement dispute.

2022-07-16

Detail

Claim $5 million! Prominent use of the "millet" trademark and false publicity was found to be infringing

Recently, The Shanghai Intellectual Property Court (hereinafter referred to as the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court) made a judgment of first instance on the dispute over trademark infringement and unfair competition between the plaintiffs Xiaomi Technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Xiaomi Technology Co., LTD.) and Xiaomi Communication Technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Xiaomi Communication Co., LTD.) and the defendants Zhou Moumou and Shanghai Dreamseeking Information Technology Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Dreamseeking Co., LTD.). It was found that the defendant Zhou Mou's behavior constituted trademark infringement and unfair competition, and Zhou Mou was sentenced to compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 500,000 yuan. After the verdict, neither party appealed, and the case has taken effect.

2022-07-16

Detail

Hello Travel "v." Xiao Liang travel "trademark infringement and unfair competition, court judgment!

Recently, Shanghai Junha Network Technology Co., Ltd. was fined 40,000 yuan by the Hefei Market Supervision Administration (Hefei Intellectual Property Office) for misleading consumers through advertising.

2022-06-28

Detail

vivo suffered trademark infringement some Tong some Di company production and sales of vivi brand mobile phone sales

The plaintiff of Weiwo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Upintong Electronic Technology Co., LTD., Shenzhen Huatang Disun Technology Co., LTD., v. Defendant Upintong Co., Ltd. used "vivi" as the trademark and "vivi" as the name of the mobile phone in its mobile phone products, Registered the website with the domain name "vivi-china.com" and advertised mobile phone products using "vivi" as the trademark and product name,

2022-05-24

Detail
5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Head Office13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

Head Office

13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Subsidiary Company2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

Subsidiary Company

2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

图片名称

Service Number

订阅号.jpg

Subscription Number


Copyright ©2016 Shenzhen Shenkexin patent Agency Co., LTD All rights reserved | 粤ICP备2021174526号

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有 | 粤ICP备2021174526号 SEO标签

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有

粤ICP备2021174526号