Copyright case | Just watched half of the show, watch the show APP disappeared......

Have you ever watched Korean dramas on your mobile app?

Professor Dondo rewrites idol shows with his powers

When the Masked King refreshes the new form of variety

At that time

Korean TV dramas are all the rage

 

But have you ever thought about

This may involve infringement

Or even a crime?

 

Brief of the case

In early May 2020, the defendant Xiong believed that the "Korean drama TV" owned by outsiders in the case. image-20221128142052-1.png The brand benefit is better, so it is transferred to their own management after discussion. Immediately, the defendant Xiong contacted the defendants Li Mou and Huang Mou, and the three conspired to launch the APP in the mobile application market, put a large number of infringing Korean dramas, Korean variety shows and other film and television works online, and collect advertising fees by placing advertisements in the APP and film and television works. His works include 795 episodes of Korean dramas such as "Forced Landing of Love", "Legend of the Blue Sea", "The King", "Hotel Druna", and 2127 episodes of Korean variety shows such as "Running Man", "Please the Refrigerator", "The Voice of Korea", and "The Masked Singer". Some of these works have been transferred to domestic video operators such as "Tencent video", "iQiyi" and "Youku", and some have not yet been introduced by domestic operators. At the same time of their respective division of labor, Xiong, Li, Huang also recruited Zhang, Zhang to improve and maintain the original APP.

 

From July 2019 to August 2020, the "Korean drama TV" APP involved in the case was launched in Huawei, OPPO, Xiaomi, VIVO and other mobile phone application markets, illegally copying 795 episodes of Korean dramas and 2,127 episodes of Korean variety shows for people to watch, and collecting advertising fees from it, with a total amount of illegal business amounting to more than 2.21 million yuan.

 

A few days ago, the Jiangyin court sentenced Xiong Mou and other 5 people who committed the crime of copyright infringement, Xiong Mou, Li Mou, Huang Mou, Zhang Mou for profit purposes, without the permission of copyright owners, jointly disseminate film and television works to the public through the information network, the circumstances are particularly serious, their behavior has constituted the crime of copyright infringement, according to law sentenced Xiong Mou and other 5 people ranging from three years to one year and three months imprisonment. Probation shall be applied, a fine ranging from 1.19 million yuan to 130,000 yuan shall be imposed, and all illegal gains shall be confiscated. The judgment of the first instance has taken legal effect.

Judge's statement

In recent years, China has continuously strengthened the protection of intellectual property rights, especially in the film and television industry to increase the intensity of infringement and illegal acts. The logic of the intellectual property protection system is that the innovation investment of the property owner in the early stage can be rewarded by the market in the later stage. Only with such a system guarantee can people feel safe to invest in creative labor, and only through innovation can the society continuously achieve rapid development and progress. If the results developed by the inventor after paying long-term and hard investment can be copied at will after being put into the market, it is a huge blow and harm to the original creativity, which is not conducive to the development and progress of society.

 

Specifically, in this case, the production of these movies and TV plays has combined a large amount of creative investment, which requires extremely high costs from script creation, shooting, post-production, publicity and distribution. Xiong et al uploaded these movies and TV plays to the APP without authorization for everyone to watch for free, and then sought profits by inserting advertisements, making the right holders of the movies and TV plays unable to obtain reasonable returns. It not only brings economic losses to the legitimate rights holders of intellectual property rights, but also hurts the enthusiasm of creation. If not stopped, high-quality intellectual achievements will gradually decrease, which is not conducive to people's enjoyment of rich spiritual life.

 

For Internet operators who make profits by disseminating works, whether it is through direct means such as viewing fees, paying membership fees, or through free viewing to obtain traffic cash, they need to ensure that they enjoy the corresponding rights to the provided works, especially the right to network communication. Here, we also call on the majority of netizens to consciously resist intellectual property infringement, support genuine, reject piracy, and protect human creativity!

Knowledge link

01 Are foreign works protected by law?

The copyright in works of foreigners and stateless persons enjoyed in accordance with the agreements concluded between China and the country to which the authors belong or have their habitual residence or the international treaties to which they are both parties shall be protected by Chinese law. In 1886, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, an international treaty on copyright protection, was formulated, and both China and Korea are signatories, as long as they are signatory states to the Convention,All their works can seek copyright protection in our country.

02 What rights does the law protect the owner of a work?

In addition to the common rights of publication, authorship, modification, integrity protection, reproduction, distribution and other rights, copyright also includes the right of information network communication. The right of information network communication refers to the right to make a work available to the public by wired or wireless means, so that the public can obtain the work at a time and place of their choice. The right of information network communication is more and more closely related to our life, and we can meet it anytime and anywhere. We all involve the right of information network communication in relevant websites and mobile APP videos on demand. (Source: Author: Xu Zhiruo (Vice President of Intellectual Property Division of Jiangyin Court)

More information and services

 

The official subscription number of "Shenkexin Intellectual Property Rights" on the code

官方订阅号.jpg

Code on the concern [Shenkexin intellectual property service platform] official service number

官方服务号.jpeg

Related Cases

32.4 million! Yunnan worm Valley IP dispute Tiktok was awarded a record amount of damages to Tencent

On October 26, Xi 'an Intermediate People's Court made a judgment of first instance on the lawsuit filed by Tencent on September 22, 2021, alleging that Tiktok infringed the copyright of Yunnan Worm Valley and unfair competition. The court held that Tiktok, as a platform, should undertake corresponding management obligations for the infringing content on its platform. At present, there are still a large number of users on the platform who have infringed on the works involved. Tiktok's failure to immediately take effective measures to delete, filter and intercept the relevant videos is an aid to infringement, and it must compensate Tencent for economic losses of more than 32.4 million yuan (an average of 2 million yuan per episode) and reasonable litigation costs of 426,931 yuan.

2022-11-03

Detail

Shenzhen a company accused of infringement, just because there is no cancellation ICP record!

This case is a dispute over infringement of the right of information network dissemination of works. In October 2021, Beijing Company A found that A website was illegally spreading many of its copyrighted works. After inquiring the ICP record information, Company A confirmed that the infringer was Company B, which is mainly engaged in home decoration in Baoan District, Shenzhen, so Company A filed a complaint against Company B to the People's Court of Baoan District, Shenzhen. Ask B company to stop the infringement and compensate for the economic loss of 50,000 yuan.

2022-10-31

Detail

Copyright help trademark, Baby bus successfully rights!

Recently, a trademark invalidation dispute involving panda Qiqi and panda Miaomiao image works has made new progress. After hearing, the Beijing Higher People's Court found that the registration of the trademark No. 34281621 "BUQI PANDA and Figure" (hereinafter referred to as the trademark involved) constituted the situation of "applying for trademark registration shall not harm the existing prior rights of others" in China's trademark law, and finally revoked the first-instance judgment and the ruling that the trademark involved should be upheld. On January 7, 2020, Fuzhou Zhiyong Company (formerly known as Baby Bus Company) filed a request for invalidation of trademark No. 34281621 "BUQI PANDA and Picture", believing that Little Dimples Technology Company registered its published and Copyrights of fine art works as trademarks.

2022-10-25

Detail

Demonstration of the case | KTV is accused of infringement some songs are not "sing and sing" | Copyright case

"K song" has become an important content of current entertainment consumption, but many people may not know that the songs played in KTV are copyrighted. If it is not legally authorized by the copyright owner, KTV may bear legal responsibilities according to law. Recently, a number of KTV in Nanchang was sued to the court of High-tech Zone for violating song copyright. The plaintiff is a media company in Songyuan City, and the defendant is a KTV concert hall in Nanchang. The plaintiffs have Copyrights to 109 music videos. The plaintiff found that the defendant without permission, for the purpose of business, without authorization, through the consumer's on-demand way in the KTV, including "Encounter True love", "Peach Blossom for three months", "China Red" and a total of 109 plaintiff's copyrighted works.

2022-10-22

Detail

Chamber adaptation Langya bang infringement judgment 1 million | Attached judgment

This case is the first case of scripted entertainment products violating the right to adapt well-known IP, and it is also the first case of scripted entertainment business activities annexing the IP name of well-known literature, film and television to constitute unfair competition, which has certain typical significance and strong industry standardization leading role.

2022-09-13

Detail

Really? ! Playing music like this is an infringement?

This case is a dispute over infringement of the right of information network dissemination of works.

2022-07-19

Detail

Learn to appeal to know network infringement, court decision!

June 27 news, China Judgment documents network recently disclosed that Beijing Century Super Star Information Technology Development Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Learning Pass") and "Chinese Academic Journals (Optical disc Edition)" electronic magazine Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as "Know Network") eight infringement of the work information network transmission right of the first instance legal documents.

2022-06-28

Detail

If the lesson plan is used by others, is it a violation of trade secrets?

Because it believes that the teaching curriculum system and related materials used by others to run art training institutions have infringed its trade secrets, Beijing Festive Culture Communication Co., Ltd. will Sue Beijing Xinxing Technology Co., LTD., Beijing Changsheng Culture Media Co., Ltd. and relevant employees to the court. The defendants are required to stop infringing trade secrets, apologize, eliminate the impact, compensate for economic losses and reasonable expenses. After hearing, the Haidian Court found that the teaching teaching plan advocated by the company in this case did not belong to the trade secret protected by the Law against Unfair Competition, and rejected all the litigation claims of the company.

2022-06-13

Detail

Case of copyright infringement and unfair competition between Shenzhen Chuangmeng World Technology Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Hifan Technology Co., LTD., Hangzhou Youbige Technology Co., LTD

Appellant Pinchuang Company and appellant Yuan Desheng Company and other utility model patent infringement disputes Yuan Desheng Plastic Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Yuan Desheng Company) is the patentee of patent No. ZL201420522729.0, the name of "an integrated selfie device" utility model patent. Zhongshan Pinchuang Plastic Products Co., LTD. (hereinafter referred to as Pinchuang Company), mainly accept foreign processing orders, production of related products. On May 9, 2017, in the (2016) Yue 73 Minchu No. 2351 case, Yuan Desheng Company reached a settlement agreement with Pinchuang Company and Zhongshan Rigao Precision Industry Co., LTD., agreeing that Pinchuang Company stopped producing, selling and promising to sell the accused infringing products, and compensated Yuan Desheng Company 35,000 yuan.

2022-06-07

Detail
5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Head Office13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

Head Office

13 / F, Building 14, Longhua Science and Technology Innovation Center (Mission Hills), No. 8 Golf Avenue, Guanlan Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen

5fa71b43-ff57-4550-a010-a0bec2f75bb4.png

Subsidiary Company2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

Subsidiary Company

2808, Block B2, Yuexiu Xinghui Junbo, No.18 Tazihu East Road, Jiangan District, Wuhan City, Hubei Province

图片名称

Service Number

订阅号.jpg

Subscription Number


Copyright ©2016 Shenzhen Shenkexin patent Agency Co., LTD All rights reserved | 粤ICP备2021174526号

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有 | 粤ICP备2021174526号 SEO标签

Copyright ©2016 深圳市深可信专利代理有限公司 版权所有

粤ICP备2021174526号